DEI Restrictions, Accreditation & Educational Protections
The debate over the proposed 2029 EPAS cannot be separated from what is already happening in states with restrictions on diversity, equity, and inclusion. Some universities and states have found ways to preserve required educational content, including through accreditation-related exceptions. Below are documented examples and the evidence behind NCRJI-SW's call for a public, state-by-state impact analysis.
If current accreditation requirements have helped protect this education, what evidence justifies weakening those requirements across the country?
17 + 1States with tracked public higher education DEI restrictions: 17 through state law, one through executive order (Oct. 14, 2026 tracker).
14UNC System institutions whose chancellors approved exceptions for DEI-related coursework in at least one major or graduate program, according to 2025 reporting.
UnknownNumber of states and social work programs with granted exceptions or accommodations nationwide. A comprehensive public inventory is still needed.
North Carolina
Accreditation helped protect coursework
Chancellors at 14 UNC System institutions granted exceptions for certain degree requirements, often citing professional accreditation and licensure. Appalachian State requested a waiver from CSWE's anti-racism-related accreditation requirements; CSWE declined, and the university's chancellor granted an institutional exception instead.
Inside Higher Ed reporting ↗ · UNC System waiver reporting ↗
Idaho
State-approved social work exemptions
Boise State reports that the Idaho State Board of Education approved exemptions covering its BSW and MSW programs, including online and advanced-standing pathways. Those programs can continue requiring DEI-related courses under the state's exemption process.
Boise State exemption documentation ↗
Kentucky
Limited exceptions remain possible
Kentucky's 2025 HB 4 imposes restrictions on DEI activities at public colleges. The University of Louisville's published implementation guidance identifies limited exceptions, including programs required for institutional accreditation. This identifies a possible protection, not a verified count of social work program exemptions.
University of Louisville guidance ↗ · Kentucky HB 4 ↗
CSWE's own guidance
Standards and accommodations are different things
CSWE states that DEI-related accreditation standards are not ordinarily waiver-eligible. It also instructs programs to explore institutional exceptions, consider legal context, and work with their accreditation specialist. Its guidance describes flexibility in documenting compliance while maintaining accreditation expectations.
CSWE guidance on ADEI and restrictions ↗
The national picture
How many states restrict DEI? How many have protected required coursework?
A tracker verified October 14, 2026 counted 17 states with statewide restrictions through laws and one through an executive order. These restrictions vary considerably; they are not all blanket bans on DEI courses. We do not have a verified national total of states, campuses, or social work programs that have used accreditation exceptions, adapted language, or obtained institutional waivers.
NCRJI-SW's demand: CSWE should publish a state-by-state analysis documenting the restrictions actually affecting accredited programs, the accommodations and protections already available or used, and what could be lost if explicit standards are weakened nationwide.
State-by-state tracker (verified October 14, 2026) ↗ · State law examples and links ↗
Source descriptions reflect publicly available reporting and institutional guidance as of October 22, 2026. Counts depend on how restrictions are defined, and the presence of a statutory exception does not establish that a specific program has received one.